incorporate information gleaned from a
home visit into a lesson, warm-up question, project, or assignment; and we are
trying to do this more in our second
year of visits. One teacher drew on what
he’d learned in talking with a student’s
father to develop a lesson with that
student in mind. The father mentioned
that his daughter, who was disengaged
in school, was highly interested in crime
scene investigation techniques and
forensics. This teacher then related a
chemistry lesson to forensic methods.
Cleveland High requires all certified
teachers to conduct home visits. Administrators, our bilingual instructional
aides, and such resource personnel as
the school nurse sometimes accompany
teachers. A partnership with the University of Washington provides extra
professional development for our staff.
Teachers receive appropriate training led
by our professional development coordinator and Cleveland High’s home visits
coordinator. The arrangement includes a
yearly stipend for teachers—$2,500 per
teacher this year—for conducting visits
and attending professional development
in the summer.
Last year, each of our 40 teachers
visited five 9th grade students’ homes;
this year, each teacher will visit the
homes of at least five students from his
or her advisory class, choosing a mix
that represents the academic, racial, and
linguistic diversity of our school.
Although some may choose to visit a
few students who are struggling, the
focus remains on getting to know the
family, not addressing problems. We
hope to eventually visit all students in
the school. We follow up by tracking
the academic progress of the visited
students in our professional development time. Teachers plan together how
to incorporate what they have learned
from visits into lessons, and they later
examine student work created during
these lessons.
Some educators perceive home visits
as auxiliary to what occurs in the class-
al., 1992) to the classroom by creating
lessons that directly relate to a family’s
knowledge or having family members
volunteer in ways that tap their skills.
For example, when Cleveland High
teacher Lydia Stone visited Sarah, she
realized that Sarah’s father had an
insider’s knowledge of standards for
college-level work. She drew on this
professor’s expertise by inviting him to
serve on the panel that judges students’
senior projects. A father who wants to
mentor male students is a great find,
and when we discovered that Sapphire’s
father wanted to make this commitment, we connected him with teachers
in a career center who could line him
up to mentor district students. He now
volunteers on our senior project boards
as well. When teachers design or extend
opportunities for including parents with
the talents of specific families in mind,
they can count on increased parental
involvement.
Family strengths have been a focus of
our home visits since we piloted the
program. In summer 2007, several
Cleveland High teachers attended a
training on engaging families conducted
by GEAR-UP, a program that works to
prepare low-income students for
college. These teachers learned of
Margery Ginsberg’s work about home
Teachers discover the family’s
musical talents on the home visit.
visits and heard presentations from
other educators who did visits. This
pilot team made a plan to initiate visits
at Cleveland High, met with teachers at
another school who were veteran visitors, and arranged for a trainer from the
district’s family engagement department
to do a workshop on conducting family
visits for all interested Cleveland
teachers that spring. They used the
process Ginsberg described in a 2007
Educational Leadership article—outlining
how to prepare the groundwork for a
home visit and collect data on funds of
knowledge—to guide their initial work.
Our teachers don’t deliver information during a visit; instead, they try to
listen. This stance is a significant departure from the traditional home visit—
and a challenge to maintain. Teachers
do provide school forms, staff and
resource directories, and other information as part of the visit, but only give
them to families just before they leave.
The primary focus is to build relationships, create a more tightly knit school
community, and eventually design classrooms that better reflect our students.
We find it highly rewarding when we